Tuesday, January 11, 2011

Another Near-Perfect Season for BCS

The following is a guest column written by Jeff Anderson, operator of one of the six BCS computers. This article also appeared in RealClearSports.

By Jeff Anderson

College football certainly doesn't make things easy for sports dilettantes. It has 120 teams (the NFL only 32). Its culture varies by region, its style of play by team. (The NFL is relatively uniform). To get much out of it, one must watch from Week 1, not merely from Week 1 of a playoff. And its season culminates not in a playoff but in a smorgasbord of bowl games.

But as those who follow it closely best understand, these very qualities are what make college football the richest, most-satisfying, and - yes - best-designed, of American sports.

The key to college football's brilliant design is that no one really designed it. It's a bottom-up sport, not a top-down one. Its postseason grew out of Tocquevillian civil associations, like the Pasadena Tournament of Roses. Later, the Bowl Championship Series (BCS) was formed to give the sport a national championship game. The BCS has greatly enhanced the sport, but it has built upon an organic foundation that has developed across the decades, rather than tearing things down and building anew.

However, those who implemented the BCS couldn't have anticipated its effect on college football's already extraordinary regular season. In the past, fans in the South or Midwest didn't particularly care whether Oregon beat Oregon State, and fans in the Midwest or West didn't much care whether Auburn beat Alabama. Under the BCS, that has changed profoundly, as fans of teams in one region are now glued to games in other regions. As Bill Plaschke of the Los Angeles Times writes, the BCS has "transformed the sport from a Saturday afternoon cookout to a national obsession."

What other sports' regular season could justly be characterized as a "national obsession"? The NFL regular season is widely watched, to be sure, but with the same intensity? Good NFL teams' starters often don't even play in their final game or two. And is anyone obsessed with the four months of quasi-exhibition games that predate college basketball's season-ending tournament?

Let's quickly recap this splendid college football season. Oregon overcame a 21-3 deficit to beat Stanford in a game that - as was clear by season's end - decided which of those teams would play for the national championship. At Alabama, Auburn rallied from a 24-0 deficit to win 28-27 and eventually join the Ducks in the title game. And Nevada rebounded from a 24-7 deficit to upset Boise State in overtime, knocking the Broncos from the ranks of the unbeaten and ending their Cinderella run. If college football had a playoff, these dramatic games would merely have tweaked teams' playoff seedings.

Undefeated TCU became the first team from a non-major conference to play in the Rose Bowl since, well, ever - beating the Big Ten's bruising Wisconsin Badgers, 21-19, to claim a title that the Horned Frogs' players will carry with them for the rest of their lives: "Rose Bowl champions." The game marked the seventh time in seven years that a team from a lesser-known conference has played in one of the major bowls (now called "BCS bowls.") To put that into perspective, prior to the BCS no such team had played in such a bowl since Air Force played in the 1971 Sugar Bowl.

In impressive performances, Alabama dominated Big Ten co-champion Michigan State, 49-7, in the Capital One Bowl, and Stanford dominated Atlantic Coast Conference champion Virginia Tech, 40-12, in the Orange Bowl. Then, in the BCS National Championship Game, undefeated Auburn (which had beaten Alabama) beat previously undefeated Oregon (which had beaten Stanford), 22-19, on a field goal on the season's final play.

With the best regular season in all of sports, a championship game that's more - not less - likely to feature the two best teams, and a full slate of colorful bowl games attended by participating teams' real fans (who have enough advanced notice to plan such trips over the holidays), college football is nearly perfect. The sport may confound the casual fan, but those who love it increasingly recognize the truth of this claim: This is college football's golden age.

====================

Anderson is co-creator of the Anderson & Hester Rankings, one of the six computer rankings used by the Bowl Championship Series (BCS). {These view are his own.}

8 comments:

HTown said...

I did a study on Anderson/Hester and the other computers based on this year's bowl season. Yeah, I know, small sample size, etc....

Anyway, have a look at the BCS Computer Results.

Anushka Sharma said...

Just a superb post I was looking for

Great work

Katrina kaif in Boom said...

A+ Grade from my side.
Excllent post.

Genelia said...

Can i get this season for BCS?

SMS Collection said...

Plz send me sms about ur latest post.

Houston said...

The BCS is not an exact science and no system can be perfect. Many people complain each year about the system and the consequences. One could argue that such controversy may actually enhance the college football experience.

While many people propose and argue for a college football playoff system I do not believe that would well serve the student athlete because it would most likely entail a longer season and more chance for injury. Football is one of the most brutal sports and injury potential is fairly significant. There is a reason that the NFL players union will not ever agree to an 18 game season and that is because it would shorten the careers of a percentage of their players.

I believe the overriding factor that needs to be considered for any system is what is the best interest of student athletes first, and colleges second. I will say that the BCS is right now apparently working and despite criticism from many provided an enjoyable last season.

There is much work that needs to be done in college football but the BCS seems to work adequately.

18 wheeler accident lawyer

halfwaytoheaven said...

It's worth pointing out that before the BCS, there WERE no major or minor conferences. TCU almost played in the Rose Bowl back in '35 (SMU beat TCU to earn the privilege). Both are currently considered "minor conference" teams by Mr. Anderson's definition (although not for very long in TCU's case).

And let's look at that Nevada-Boise State game again. The Wolfpack continued to trail the Broncos in the BCS standings despite having the same record and having, you know, BEATEN THEM. How does that demonstrate the wonder of the BCS system?

And Mr. Anderson of course focuses on the highs of the BCS bowl season and ignores the negatives. Virginia Tech, as ACC Champion, went to the Orange Bowl, despite having lost to William & Mary. They were soundly defeated, to the surprise of no one who was paying attention. And do I even need to mention the Fiesta Bowl? Meanwhile, Boise State (and Nevada, of course) are relegated to the kids' table. Can you imagine if BSU had been facing OU in the Fiesta instead of UConn? Man, what a lame match-up that would have been.

Finally, no one who watched the BCS title game can honestly say that those were the two best teams in the country. Sloppy, sloppy play. I would have taken the Horned Frogs against either of them. And it's not like that's the first time there's been a questionable match-up in the title game. In 2009, there were five undefeated teams. In 2008, OU went over UT, who had the same record as the Sooners and had beaten them head-to-head. I'd go further back, but the point is that the BCS system works great for picking a title match-up so long as there are two - and only two - undefeated teams from BCS AQ conferences. Otherwise, it's shaky. You want a champ, you need a playoff.

Best Sayings said...

This is really great information site.
Nice Site....great work...
Quotes on Love
Hindi Movies
Birthday SMS
Diwali SMS

Google